Saturday, April 3, 2010
Saturday Morning Painfully Early Football: Schalke 04 v. Bayern Munchen
Jermaine Jones isn't even in the substitutes bench for Schalke. Therefore, I am going back to bed. Please Schalke, telephone me when you plan to play him, and I'll watch if the telecast is available. Guten nacht Deutchland.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Better Know a US Footballer: Jared Jeffrey, FSV Mainz
At the tender age of 19 he is just on solid food. He attended the IMG Soccer Academy. He has 7 caps and 1 goal for United States youth teams. For the last two years he toiled in the reserves for Club Brugge in Belgium, but never earned a first team place there.
In the 2009-10 winter transfer window, Jared signed a contract with FSV Mainz of the German Bundesliga. Perhaps it will be a fresh start in the Rhineland for the American midfielder. Such American football luminaries such as Conor Casey, and Oguchi Onyewu used to toil for Mainz. Young Preston Zimmerman is also there, with the amateur team FSV Mainz 05 II.
Here’s hoping you get a decent run-out in Germany Jared.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Better Know a US Footballer: Seb Harris, Northampton Town
You may or may not have heard of him, but Seb Harris left his place in the PDL’s Michigan Bucks in 2009 to give it a shot in Jolly Old.
Sebastian ‘Seb’ Harris, the former Oakland University Golden Grizzly (12 goals in 45 appearances), now plays for Northampton Town in England’s League Two. He has made 6 appearances for The Cobblers in all competitions, scoring one goal - a late winner against Cheltenham.
Former Northampton gaffer Stuart Gray had this to say about Seb (August 2009):
“...He is very raw, but he is full of energy and has plenty of enthusiasm. He has caught our eye with his displays in training and he will be staying with us until the end of the year.”
“He has a lot of good attributes, he has pace and is good in the air and with day in, day out coaching and training here we think he will improve.”
“Seb is a player who is work in progress but we are happy to give him the time to develop and we think there is potentially a good player there...”
His current manager Ian Sampson said (March 2010):
“He's worked ever so hard and improved a lot since Christmas.”
"It's not easy to come such a distance and try your luck in the English game. It's a totally different environment. He deserves quite a few plaudits.”
The Rochester, Michigan native also played for the Michigan Bucks of the Premier Development League appearing 14 times and scoring 1 goal.
Good on ye Seb, we hope you make it.
Monday, February 1, 2010
New York Rangers: White Flag From Slats, With A Tin Lining
If the Jokinen/Prust for Kotalik/Higgins deal goes through - and that’s a big if, you might wonder how this deal helps either New York or Calgary. The name of the game is Admit You Made a Mistake, And Dump Salary. Sather and Sutter are ready to play.
This is the way you play:
First you make a horrible sports management decision and sign an underachieving player to a multi-year contract. Then realizing how badly you screwed up, you deal that player for another high-priced underachiever - provided that high-priced underachiever has a contract that expires at the end of the season. If the player helps you...fine. If he doesn’t, you can release him to free agency anyway. It’s a best case scenario for a player that you know you couldn’t get anything good for in a trade.
Calgary gets: Higgins will either help and get re-signed, or he will drop into the free agent market, opening up $2.25M in the salary cap. Kotalik may or may not help the Flames. What Calgary does gain from this is a player with two years and change left on his contract, instead of Jokinen who would’ve probably become a free agent at the end of the year. Calgary also immediately sheds $500K from their salary cap total.
New York gets: Jokinen who will either help or not. If he helps, they may choose to re-sign him. If he doesn’t the Rangers will release him into free agency and will immediately clear $5.25M in salary cap room. Prust not only provides youth, but perhaps will add the toughness that Voros and Brashear failed to consistently provide this year. If Prust makes it on Broadway, it will be the tin lining of the storm cloud that is the Rangers salary cap situation. If Prust is a wash, he can be released to free agency at the end of the season clearing $500K in the salary cap.
This is the way you play:
First you make a horrible sports management decision and sign an underachieving player to a multi-year contract. Then realizing how badly you screwed up, you deal that player for another high-priced underachiever - provided that high-priced underachiever has a contract that expires at the end of the season. If the player helps you...fine. If he doesn’t, you can release him to free agency anyway. It’s a best case scenario for a player that you know you couldn’t get anything good for in a trade.
Calgary gets: Higgins will either help and get re-signed, or he will drop into the free agent market, opening up $2.25M in the salary cap. Kotalik may or may not help the Flames. What Calgary does gain from this is a player with two years and change left on his contract, instead of Jokinen who would’ve probably become a free agent at the end of the year. Calgary also immediately sheds $500K from their salary cap total.
New York gets: Jokinen who will either help or not. If he helps, they may choose to re-sign him. If he doesn’t the Rangers will release him into free agency and will immediately clear $5.25M in salary cap room. Prust not only provides youth, but perhaps will add the toughness that Voros and Brashear failed to consistently provide this year. If Prust makes it on Broadway, it will be the tin lining of the storm cloud that is the Rangers salary cap situation. If Prust is a wash, he can be released to free agency at the end of the season clearing $500K in the salary cap.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
New York Rangers: To Trade Or Not To Trade?
The New York Rangers have become victims of their own prosperity. I sometimes wonder if it would be better if the Rangers had the budget and assets of a small market club, as then they couldn’t afford to meet the astronomical salary demands of would-be saviors.
With a salary cap of $56.8M, the Rangers have only $312K remaining. This has become common knowledge and has been written about extensively. The current payroll situation of the Rangers will determine their trade deadline strategy. And that strategy is perhaps to make no trades at all.
The temptation would be to try to acquire Ilya Kovalchuk from Atlanta at the trade dealine this March. Kovalchuk is a big, strong, fast, and tough player that scores loads of goals. Atlanta seem to have no chance of re-signing him, and will try to get as much as possible for the franchise cornerstone they are about to lose. The Rangers should definitely RESIST this temptation. The price for Kovalchuk is simply too high. Atlanta has already asked the LA Kings for Jack Johnson, and a laundry list of young prospects. The Rangers cannot afford to trade away their developing young talent at this stage. Even if the Rangers could get Kovalchuk without completely mortgaging the future, they would be in the same predicament with the salary cap that is inhibiting their trade options. Also, Kovalchuk's contract would still expire at the end of the season.
If Kovalchuk isn’t traded either by the trade deadline or at this Summer’s draft, he will become an unrestricted free agent. The Rangers don’t have blockbuster free agent cash or cap room at this stage, so it’s my belief that the Kovalchuk to the Rangers scenario is a dead issue with the Rangers’ current payroll configuration.
No GM in the NHL with any sense left is going to go anywhere near the bloat-tastic salaries of the New York Rangers' Chris Drury, Michael Roszival, or Wade Redden. No one in the NHL is taking on players of that salary, even players who are relatively young AND producing.
Any player young enough and skilled enough to be an interesting trade option for the New York Rangers is likely to demand too much salary, and that player’s club will demand far too many of the Rangers young prospects and/or draft picks in return.
The situation between the Rangers' cap bloat and a string of poor results is quickly approaching a flashpoint. Approaching a flashpoint much as it did a year ago when then head coach Tom Renney was fired. Clearly there will be changes in personnel. The question is: Will it be players moving on, or management or both? At this point it looks like both the jobs of coach John Tortorella and general manager Glen Sather are in serious jeopardy. Something must break.
The answer to the Rangers problems may lie within the organization...
Drury produces respectable numbers for a player making half his salary. Therefore, something must be done about it. Drury has a no movement and a no trade clause in his contract. Therefore he can’t be sent to the minors to clear cap room, and he can’t be traded without his consent. Even if Drury gave his consent, it is debatable that any teams would have him at a $7.05M cap hit. There is an additional wrinkle in that Drury is the captain of the team. Therefore the club has no room to maneuver without Drury’s consent. It would seem that the Rangers and Drury are stuck with each other until 2012.
Hope is not lost though. The Rangers have a number of prospects waiting in the wings at their Hartford AHL affiliate. Though it might be debatable whether or not these young players are ready for the NHL, it would appear the Rangers have cornered themselves into accelerating their development.
If the Rangers send Wade Redden, and Michael Roszival to the Hartford Wolf Pack, that would free up $11.5M in the salary cap. They would have to clear waivers, but I doubt that any other NHL club could afford to take on their salaries. The alternative would be to continue on as it stands, rewarding players who produce subpar results with first team places until 2012 for Roszival, and/or 2014 for Redden. The status quo isn’t working, and the Rangers’ management is in a position where it must either send a clear message that failure to produce results will result in serious consequences, or the club will surely be forced into firing, or calling for the resignations of Tortorella and Sather.
Defensemen Bobby Sanguinetti and Ilkka Heikkinen have spent some time this year with the Rangers and acquitted themselves reasonably well. Although they would lack the experience and seasoning of Roszival and Redden, the Rangers might gain an edge in speed, grit, and enthusiasm by promoting Sanguinetti, and Heikkinen.
The newfound cap space could be used to sign or trade for four or five players of essentially the same quality that Roszival and Redden are currently displaying. Perhaps the open cap space could be used to promote Corey Locke who is leading the Hartford Wolf Pack with 19 goals and 53 total points. Locke cannot be promoted until cap space is cleared or until another player is demoted to Hartford to open enough cap room. Hartford’s Dale Weise and P.A. Parenteau have also shown an ability to score goals.
Another problem has been the Rangers lack of toughness. The Rangers lack an enforcer that strikes fear into the hearts of the NHL’s evil-doers. The attempts of Donald Brashear, and Aaron Voros to fill this void have been less than convincing. Both players should be sent down to Hartford, or traded. Perhaps Dane Byers from Hartford, who has also spent time this year in a Rangers sweater could become a tough guy that might actually score a goal or two. Weise and Devin DiDiomete might also lend some toughness, and Weise can actually score goals as he has 15 already for Hartford this season.
Winger Ales Kotalik has at times produced, but more often that he scores goals, he creates goals for the opposition with his propensity to turn the puck over at the worst possible times, and in the worst possible areas of the ice. He makes $3M/year. If they must trade someone, perhaps a solution is Kotalik to a team for a draft pick. At this point, even a third round choice would be meaningful in return for Kotalik.
There is another far less attractive option to opening cap space. The Rangers can admit their mistake of overpaying Drury, Roszival, and Redden and buyout the remainder of their contracts for the purposes of releasing them. This may not even be possible depending on how leveraged the Rangers already are against the sale value of the club.
If Drury, Roszival, and Redden wanted to truly demonstrate their commitment to win to their teammates they can request that their contracts be restructured to open cap space. I wouldn’t hold my breath for that though, as why should they give up anything they have earned so far? Just to help an organization that can’t mind it’s own finances? Not likely.
It must be pointed out that the aforementioned players are good players. The fact of the business of professional hockey is that in the absence of positive results, changes must be made. The worse the Rangers results, the closer the club is to making changes with player personnel and/or with management personnel. Finger-pointing must end. Results must be achieved. It is my belief that the Rangers would be best served by completing the rebuild that was started when Enver Lisin, Artem Anisimov, Matt Gilroy, and Michael Del Zotto made the first team last Fall. Potential talent must be tested to see if it is actual talent. Grumpy and disruptive elements must be moved on or sent down.
Currently the Rangers are teetering at the edge of qualification for the Stanley Cup playoffs. Should Atlanta win their match today against Philadelphia, the Rangers will fall into 9th place, just outside the qualification zone. Although the Rangers have 28 games left to play, their current form of three wins in their last ten games doesn’t inspire confidence.
Should the Rangers fail to make the playoffs, or make the playoffs and crash out in the first or second round, Rangers supporters and fans would hope a severe reckoning awaits both players and management at the end of play this year.
With a salary cap of $56.8M, the Rangers have only $312K remaining. This has become common knowledge and has been written about extensively. The current payroll situation of the Rangers will determine their trade deadline strategy. And that strategy is perhaps to make no trades at all.
The temptation would be to try to acquire Ilya Kovalchuk from Atlanta at the trade dealine this March. Kovalchuk is a big, strong, fast, and tough player that scores loads of goals. Atlanta seem to have no chance of re-signing him, and will try to get as much as possible for the franchise cornerstone they are about to lose. The Rangers should definitely RESIST this temptation. The price for Kovalchuk is simply too high. Atlanta has already asked the LA Kings for Jack Johnson, and a laundry list of young prospects. The Rangers cannot afford to trade away their developing young talent at this stage. Even if the Rangers could get Kovalchuk without completely mortgaging the future, they would be in the same predicament with the salary cap that is inhibiting their trade options. Also, Kovalchuk's contract would still expire at the end of the season.
If Kovalchuk isn’t traded either by the trade deadline or at this Summer’s draft, he will become an unrestricted free agent. The Rangers don’t have blockbuster free agent cash or cap room at this stage, so it’s my belief that the Kovalchuk to the Rangers scenario is a dead issue with the Rangers’ current payroll configuration.
No GM in the NHL with any sense left is going to go anywhere near the bloat-tastic salaries of the New York Rangers' Chris Drury, Michael Roszival, or Wade Redden. No one in the NHL is taking on players of that salary, even players who are relatively young AND producing.
Any player young enough and skilled enough to be an interesting trade option for the New York Rangers is likely to demand too much salary, and that player’s club will demand far too many of the Rangers young prospects and/or draft picks in return.
The situation between the Rangers' cap bloat and a string of poor results is quickly approaching a flashpoint. Approaching a flashpoint much as it did a year ago when then head coach Tom Renney was fired. Clearly there will be changes in personnel. The question is: Will it be players moving on, or management or both? At this point it looks like both the jobs of coach John Tortorella and general manager Glen Sather are in serious jeopardy. Something must break.
The answer to the Rangers problems may lie within the organization...
Drury produces respectable numbers for a player making half his salary. Therefore, something must be done about it. Drury has a no movement and a no trade clause in his contract. Therefore he can’t be sent to the minors to clear cap room, and he can’t be traded without his consent. Even if Drury gave his consent, it is debatable that any teams would have him at a $7.05M cap hit. There is an additional wrinkle in that Drury is the captain of the team. Therefore the club has no room to maneuver without Drury’s consent. It would seem that the Rangers and Drury are stuck with each other until 2012.
Hope is not lost though. The Rangers have a number of prospects waiting in the wings at their Hartford AHL affiliate. Though it might be debatable whether or not these young players are ready for the NHL, it would appear the Rangers have cornered themselves into accelerating their development.
If the Rangers send Wade Redden, and Michael Roszival to the Hartford Wolf Pack, that would free up $11.5M in the salary cap. They would have to clear waivers, but I doubt that any other NHL club could afford to take on their salaries. The alternative would be to continue on as it stands, rewarding players who produce subpar results with first team places until 2012 for Roszival, and/or 2014 for Redden. The status quo isn’t working, and the Rangers’ management is in a position where it must either send a clear message that failure to produce results will result in serious consequences, or the club will surely be forced into firing, or calling for the resignations of Tortorella and Sather.
Defensemen Bobby Sanguinetti and Ilkka Heikkinen have spent some time this year with the Rangers and acquitted themselves reasonably well. Although they would lack the experience and seasoning of Roszival and Redden, the Rangers might gain an edge in speed, grit, and enthusiasm by promoting Sanguinetti, and Heikkinen.
The newfound cap space could be used to sign or trade for four or five players of essentially the same quality that Roszival and Redden are currently displaying. Perhaps the open cap space could be used to promote Corey Locke who is leading the Hartford Wolf Pack with 19 goals and 53 total points. Locke cannot be promoted until cap space is cleared or until another player is demoted to Hartford to open enough cap room. Hartford’s Dale Weise and P.A. Parenteau have also shown an ability to score goals.
Another problem has been the Rangers lack of toughness. The Rangers lack an enforcer that strikes fear into the hearts of the NHL’s evil-doers. The attempts of Donald Brashear, and Aaron Voros to fill this void have been less than convincing. Both players should be sent down to Hartford, or traded. Perhaps Dane Byers from Hartford, who has also spent time this year in a Rangers sweater could become a tough guy that might actually score a goal or two. Weise and Devin DiDiomete might also lend some toughness, and Weise can actually score goals as he has 15 already for Hartford this season.
Winger Ales Kotalik has at times produced, but more often that he scores goals, he creates goals for the opposition with his propensity to turn the puck over at the worst possible times, and in the worst possible areas of the ice. He makes $3M/year. If they must trade someone, perhaps a solution is Kotalik to a team for a draft pick. At this point, even a third round choice would be meaningful in return for Kotalik.
There is another far less attractive option to opening cap space. The Rangers can admit their mistake of overpaying Drury, Roszival, and Redden and buyout the remainder of their contracts for the purposes of releasing them. This may not even be possible depending on how leveraged the Rangers already are against the sale value of the club.
If Drury, Roszival, and Redden wanted to truly demonstrate their commitment to win to their teammates they can request that their contracts be restructured to open cap space. I wouldn’t hold my breath for that though, as why should they give up anything they have earned so far? Just to help an organization that can’t mind it’s own finances? Not likely.
It must be pointed out that the aforementioned players are good players. The fact of the business of professional hockey is that in the absence of positive results, changes must be made. The worse the Rangers results, the closer the club is to making changes with player personnel and/or with management personnel. Finger-pointing must end. Results must be achieved. It is my belief that the Rangers would be best served by completing the rebuild that was started when Enver Lisin, Artem Anisimov, Matt Gilroy, and Michael Del Zotto made the first team last Fall. Potential talent must be tested to see if it is actual talent. Grumpy and disruptive elements must be moved on or sent down.
Currently the Rangers are teetering at the edge of qualification for the Stanley Cup playoffs. Should Atlanta win their match today against Philadelphia, the Rangers will fall into 9th place, just outside the qualification zone. Although the Rangers have 28 games left to play, their current form of three wins in their last ten games doesn’t inspire confidence.
Should the Rangers fail to make the playoffs, or make the playoffs and crash out in the first or second round, Rangers supporters and fans would hope a severe reckoning awaits both players and management at the end of play this year.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Gaming: FIFA 10 As Grudge Therapy
Over the years it’s been difficult following American players trying to make their mark at different clubs in Britain and on the European continent. Often, it’s discouraging as they are often pushed into the reserve teams and collect dust until forgotten. There is a helplessness and anger that comes with this. And I have come to identify certain clubs in a certain way when I play FIFA 10, that motivates me to beat them as badly as possible. This is the way I identify certain teams when I play video football:
Tottenham: The club that kept Kasey Keller on the bench for so long, even though he was clearly superior to Neil Sullivan, the player he was backing up at the time.
Liverpool: The club that never properly appreciated either Brad Freidel or Zak Whitbread.
Manchester United: The club that buries American players in the reserves until they are coated with a thick layer of dust and then gets rid of them. Jovan Kirovski, Jonathan Spector, Kenny Cooper Jr., Paul Rachubka, John Thorrington (youth academy) to name at least three who deserved more of an opportunity with them. Tim Howard is a partial exception to this list, and started in goal for United for a fairly long stretch. Before his contract expired he was persuaded to re-sign with the club, presumably to continue starting in goal. Soon after Tim signed on, United acquired Dutch first choice ‘keeper Edwin van der Saar, and Howard was relegated to the bench for the rest of his time at Old Trafford. Nice way to treat someone who came up trumps for you Sir Alex. With Howard now safely ensconced at Goodison Park, I relish every Everton victory over United. I relish any club’s defeat of United. In video footy, I kick the spaghetti out of United whenever possible.
Arsenal: The club that sent Frankie Simek down.
Derby County: Drummed out John Harkes after then manager Arthur Cox moved on, and eventually Benny Feilhaber.
Reading: Drummed out both Bobby Convey and Marcus Hahnemann even though both were fine servants of the club. Now I have this Reading beach hat, and no Americans there to cheer on. You owe me £10 Reading Football Club.
Leverkusen: Donovan was never given a fair chance to impress there. Leverkusen contributed to tarnishing Donovan’s reputation as a footballer giving rise to the common perception that he isn’t fit to play football at the top level in Europe. This perception is currently being debunked by Landon’s solid performances with Everton.
Bayern Munich: Although then manager Klinsmann wanted Donovan, the top brass at the club wouldn’t have any of it. Klinsmann was later unceremoniously given the sack.
Borussia Dortmund: Another club that had Jovan Kirovski riding the pine pony.
Hamburg: Never gave Preston Zimmerman a proper run-out.
Racing Santander: Was quick enough to move on Danny Szetela, never allowing him one chance in the side.
Villareal: Purchased Jozmer Altidore for $10M and let pretty much let him ride the bench (only 6 appearances). Then loaned him out to Xeres who never played him. Currently loaning out Altidore to Hull, where he has made 15 appearances.
Xeres: See Villareal.
AC Milan: Not only is this club a tool for Italy PM Silvio Berlusconi’s political propaganda (He also is a media magnate and owns the club), but Milan have mired American defensive standout Oguchi “Gooch” Onyewu on the bench. When Onyewu was injured playing for the USA, Milan demanded financial reparations. Nice touch. Onyewu has not yet appeared for Milan, and I’m not holding my breath.
Sampdoria: Gabe Ferrari has been there since 2007 and hasn’t seen one first team appearance. He is currently on loan at Foggia.
Belenenses: Limited Freddy Adu to 4 appearances while on loan from Benfica.
Lorient: Drummed out former Cal D-Mid standout Andrew Jacobsen
Lens: Signed Joe Cannon and then never played him.
Red Bull Salzburg: Really I hate Red Bull for ruining MetroStars with a name beginning with a soft drink. But any team starting with that name I want to beat in video footy. I do not recognize a soft drink company's employees as New York's lone football entry in MLS. I'll never forget the little Quicktime movie they made of Alexi Lalas telling us how good this move was going to be for the club and for its fans, and then drinking a Red Bull and facing the product at the end of it. Disgusting.
MLS football in New York died on March 9 2006. Rest in peace Metro. Up the FC New York in 2011.
Some may think it petty, but for me it is a way to virtually blow off steam regarding football situations that are beyond my control. It also adds spice to certain games of FIFA 10. Not that I’m one to hold a grudge. [grins]
Tottenham: The club that kept Kasey Keller on the bench for so long, even though he was clearly superior to Neil Sullivan, the player he was backing up at the time.
Liverpool: The club that never properly appreciated either Brad Freidel or Zak Whitbread.
Manchester United: The club that buries American players in the reserves until they are coated with a thick layer of dust and then gets rid of them. Jovan Kirovski, Jonathan Spector, Kenny Cooper Jr., Paul Rachubka, John Thorrington (youth academy) to name at least three who deserved more of an opportunity with them. Tim Howard is a partial exception to this list, and started in goal for United for a fairly long stretch. Before his contract expired he was persuaded to re-sign with the club, presumably to continue starting in goal. Soon after Tim signed on, United acquired Dutch first choice ‘keeper Edwin van der Saar, and Howard was relegated to the bench for the rest of his time at Old Trafford. Nice way to treat someone who came up trumps for you Sir Alex. With Howard now safely ensconced at Goodison Park, I relish every Everton victory over United. I relish any club’s defeat of United. In video footy, I kick the spaghetti out of United whenever possible.
Arsenal: The club that sent Frankie Simek down.
Derby County: Drummed out John Harkes after then manager Arthur Cox moved on, and eventually Benny Feilhaber.
Reading: Drummed out both Bobby Convey and Marcus Hahnemann even though both were fine servants of the club. Now I have this Reading beach hat, and no Americans there to cheer on. You owe me £10 Reading Football Club.
Leverkusen: Donovan was never given a fair chance to impress there. Leverkusen contributed to tarnishing Donovan’s reputation as a footballer giving rise to the common perception that he isn’t fit to play football at the top level in Europe. This perception is currently being debunked by Landon’s solid performances with Everton.
Bayern Munich: Although then manager Klinsmann wanted Donovan, the top brass at the club wouldn’t have any of it. Klinsmann was later unceremoniously given the sack.
Borussia Dortmund: Another club that had Jovan Kirovski riding the pine pony.
Hamburg: Never gave Preston Zimmerman a proper run-out.
Racing Santander: Was quick enough to move on Danny Szetela, never allowing him one chance in the side.
Villareal: Purchased Jozmer Altidore for $10M and let pretty much let him ride the bench (only 6 appearances). Then loaned him out to Xeres who never played him. Currently loaning out Altidore to Hull, where he has made 15 appearances.
Xeres: See Villareal.
AC Milan: Not only is this club a tool for Italy PM Silvio Berlusconi’s political propaganda (He also is a media magnate and owns the club), but Milan have mired American defensive standout Oguchi “Gooch” Onyewu on the bench. When Onyewu was injured playing for the USA, Milan demanded financial reparations. Nice touch. Onyewu has not yet appeared for Milan, and I’m not holding my breath.
Sampdoria: Gabe Ferrari has been there since 2007 and hasn’t seen one first team appearance. He is currently on loan at Foggia.
Belenenses: Limited Freddy Adu to 4 appearances while on loan from Benfica.
Lorient: Drummed out former Cal D-Mid standout Andrew Jacobsen
Lens: Signed Joe Cannon and then never played him.
Red Bull Salzburg: Really I hate Red Bull for ruining MetroStars with a name beginning with a soft drink. But any team starting with that name I want to beat in video footy. I do not recognize a soft drink company's employees as New York's lone football entry in MLS. I'll never forget the little Quicktime movie they made of Alexi Lalas telling us how good this move was going to be for the club and for its fans, and then drinking a Red Bull and facing the product at the end of it. Disgusting.
MLS football in New York died on March 9 2006. Rest in peace Metro. Up the FC New York in 2011.
Some may think it petty, but for me it is a way to virtually blow off steam regarding football situations that are beyond my control. It also adds spice to certain games of FIFA 10. Not that I’m one to hold a grudge. [grins]
Monday, January 25, 2010
New York Rangers: Will The Real New York Rangers Please Stand Up?
New York Rangers Current Form/Last 10 Matches: 3 victories, 5 losses, 2 shootout losses
Rangers 2:4 Pittsburgh
Montreal 6:0 Rangers
Philadelphia 2:0 Rangers
Rangers 8:2 Tampa Bay
Rangers 6:2 Montreal
St. Louis 4:1 Rangers
Ottawa 2:0 Rangers
New Jersey 0:0 Rangers
(New Jersey wins shootout)
Rangers 3:1 Boston
Atlanta 1:1 Rangers
(Atlanta wins shootout)
Rangers Goals For: 17
Rangers Goals Against: 24
Points from last 10 Matches: 8 of 20 possible points
Times shut out: 4
The New York Rangers hockey club currently has the extreme dynamics of a rollercoaster. Winning 8:2 one night and losing 6:0 four nights later. 8 out of 20 possible points in the last 10 matches is an adequate achievement. However, it’s also nothing that will cause the Rangers’ divisional and conference rivals to lose any sleep over. Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde...which Ranger side will face Stanley Cup holders Pittsburgh today?
The knowledgeable fan base of the club understands that the club’s senior veteran players, some of whom are signed to very big contracts, are underperforming. Consistency eludes the Rangers, and even Coach John Tortorella is at a loss to explain why.
It’s easy to understand why Torts can't explain the string of poor results, as the all the pieces for the Rangers’ success appear to be in place.
The Rangers possess a stalwart defense led by standout goaltender Henrik Lundqvist who is first choice for Sweden in addition to his duties with the Rangers. The Rangers also have a laundry list of young goaltenders working towards becoming his backup.
Young veteran defensemen Dan Girardi and Mark Staal are becoming leaders by example. Though playing steady, if unspectacular hockey neither Michael Roszival nor Wade Redden are producing numbers that justify their respective yearly salaries of $5M and $6.5M. The two rookie defensemen, Michael Del Zotto and Matt Gilroy have shown flashes of brilliance, and seem to gain more consistency and confidence with each passing game. The swift development of Staal and Girardi is enough to make you wonder how much time will pass before the Rangers management team will find it preferable to offload (or buy out) the contracts of aging veterans Roszival and Redden (Both defensemen have a list of eight clubs that they will not accept being moved to) so that they may promote from the legion of young defense prospects in Hartford, such as Bobby Sanguinetti, Ilkka Heikkinen, Michael Sauer, Nigel Williams, and Corey Potter. Perhaps for the Rangers the future is now.
The questions and variables come from the seeming inability of most of the Ranger forwards to score goals consistently. Marian Gaborik is certainly having the sort of year that justifies his $7.5M salary, as he is amongst the league leaders is goals and points. Prospal, Dubinsky, and Callahan are also playing well. Of those three, only Callahan makes more than $2M. The club also seems to be getting value for money for: (the infamous) Sean Avery, young Russian forwards Artem Anisimov and Enver Lisin are quietly contributing in bits and pieces with their plus/minus scores of -2 and -1 seeming to indicate that they are pulling their weight on defense as well. Brian Boyle has also been a pleasant surprise. At $525K/year, Boyle finishes his checks and from time to time adds offense. The struggling, if hard-working, Chris Higgins can’t be faulted for his work rate or attitude. Having said this, he needs to produce more than 6 goals and 13 points in 51 matches at $2.25M/year to remain on the team. Ales Kotalik had a strong start to the season, but makes $3M/year and has only 8 goals and 22 points in 44 matches. Kotalik is also over 30 years-old and is -16...overpaid, not the fastest skater, doesn’t always finish his checks, fails to consistently score, and seems to be a defensive liability. Even Kotalik’s vaunted hard shot isn’t worth much if the puck doesn’t go in the net.
It doesn’t seem that Aaron Voros or Donald Brashear has been the policeman that the Rangers have been looking for to deal with the NHL’s evil-doers. It bears mentioning that Voros is showing an improved vein of form after a long layover of being scratched on a nightly basis. Voros is hitting, stirring things up, and occasionally contributing in the scoring department. Voros isn’t the end solution, but he’s doing well enough for now in the role of tough guy. Brashear at $1.4M/year and Voros at $1M/year are being payed too much money for what they have managed to contribute this year. The Rangers need an economy tough guy that doesn’t take up as much space in the salary cap. It might not be a bad idea to consider promoting some young player from the minors. Perhaps Hartford Wolf Pack forwards Dane Byers, Devin DiDiomete or Justin Soryal could carry that load...certainly more value for money at $500K or $508K/year.
The Rangers’ struggling skipper Chris Drury, at a salary of $7.05M, has only 8 goals and 19 points in 47 matches. Given the intangibles of grit (wins face-offs, blocks shots) and leadership, that Drury brings to the Rangers, both on the ice and (you would assume) in the dressing room, it’s difficult to assess what should be done about this situation. Even with all that Drury brings to the table for the Rangers, is he worth that big money even without the consistent and prolific scoring you would expect of a player at that salary point? What would be (even if it were possible at his inflated salary and “No Movement” clause) the impact of moving Drury on? At his current salary, he would be a very tough trade for another team to swallow. If the Rangers are winning tons of games, Drury’s salary becomes a non-issue. But this is not the case.
The Rangers are riding the rollercoaster of .500 hockey and their salary cap is stretched a bit beyond the breaking point. Meanwhile promising and talented young hopefuls toil in the NCAA, European leagues, junior hockey, and in the AHL. All of which makes you begin to wonder how long the Rangers can afford to juggle such huge contracts without corresponding return in production, and even more importantly how they can justify continuing to juggle them with so much young, affordable talent to choose from.
So the questions for the Rangers seem to be consistency, scoring, and toughness. The Rangers have to make up their mind as an organization whether or not it’s worth it to continue to have marquee names at the club at an inflated salary. The Rangers have to make up their minds whether or not they are going to commit to a full rebuild of the team. Del Zotto, Girardi, Anisimov, and Lisin being incorporated into the team is a good beginning. If the Rangers are going to compete for championships, it’s going to take more than what they bring to the table now. Much more.
Rangers 2:4 Pittsburgh
Montreal 6:0 Rangers
Philadelphia 2:0 Rangers
Rangers 8:2 Tampa Bay
Rangers 6:2 Montreal
St. Louis 4:1 Rangers
Ottawa 2:0 Rangers
New Jersey 0:0 Rangers
(New Jersey wins shootout)
Rangers 3:1 Boston
Atlanta 1:1 Rangers
(Atlanta wins shootout)
Rangers Goals For: 17
Rangers Goals Against: 24
Points from last 10 Matches: 8 of 20 possible points
Times shut out: 4
The New York Rangers hockey club currently has the extreme dynamics of a rollercoaster. Winning 8:2 one night and losing 6:0 four nights later. 8 out of 20 possible points in the last 10 matches is an adequate achievement. However, it’s also nothing that will cause the Rangers’ divisional and conference rivals to lose any sleep over. Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde...which Ranger side will face Stanley Cup holders Pittsburgh today?
The knowledgeable fan base of the club understands that the club’s senior veteran players, some of whom are signed to very big contracts, are underperforming. Consistency eludes the Rangers, and even Coach John Tortorella is at a loss to explain why.
It’s easy to understand why Torts can't explain the string of poor results, as the all the pieces for the Rangers’ success appear to be in place.
The Rangers possess a stalwart defense led by standout goaltender Henrik Lundqvist who is first choice for Sweden in addition to his duties with the Rangers. The Rangers also have a laundry list of young goaltenders working towards becoming his backup.
Young veteran defensemen Dan Girardi and Mark Staal are becoming leaders by example. Though playing steady, if unspectacular hockey neither Michael Roszival nor Wade Redden are producing numbers that justify their respective yearly salaries of $5M and $6.5M. The two rookie defensemen, Michael Del Zotto and Matt Gilroy have shown flashes of brilliance, and seem to gain more consistency and confidence with each passing game. The swift development of Staal and Girardi is enough to make you wonder how much time will pass before the Rangers management team will find it preferable to offload (or buy out) the contracts of aging veterans Roszival and Redden (Both defensemen have a list of eight clubs that they will not accept being moved to) so that they may promote from the legion of young defense prospects in Hartford, such as Bobby Sanguinetti, Ilkka Heikkinen, Michael Sauer, Nigel Williams, and Corey Potter. Perhaps for the Rangers the future is now.
The questions and variables come from the seeming inability of most of the Ranger forwards to score goals consistently. Marian Gaborik is certainly having the sort of year that justifies his $7.5M salary, as he is amongst the league leaders is goals and points. Prospal, Dubinsky, and Callahan are also playing well. Of those three, only Callahan makes more than $2M. The club also seems to be getting value for money for: (the infamous) Sean Avery, young Russian forwards Artem Anisimov and Enver Lisin are quietly contributing in bits and pieces with their plus/minus scores of -2 and -1 seeming to indicate that they are pulling their weight on defense as well. Brian Boyle has also been a pleasant surprise. At $525K/year, Boyle finishes his checks and from time to time adds offense. The struggling, if hard-working, Chris Higgins can’t be faulted for his work rate or attitude. Having said this, he needs to produce more than 6 goals and 13 points in 51 matches at $2.25M/year to remain on the team. Ales Kotalik had a strong start to the season, but makes $3M/year and has only 8 goals and 22 points in 44 matches. Kotalik is also over 30 years-old and is -16...overpaid, not the fastest skater, doesn’t always finish his checks, fails to consistently score, and seems to be a defensive liability. Even Kotalik’s vaunted hard shot isn’t worth much if the puck doesn’t go in the net.
It doesn’t seem that Aaron Voros or Donald Brashear has been the policeman that the Rangers have been looking for to deal with the NHL’s evil-doers. It bears mentioning that Voros is showing an improved vein of form after a long layover of being scratched on a nightly basis. Voros is hitting, stirring things up, and occasionally contributing in the scoring department. Voros isn’t the end solution, but he’s doing well enough for now in the role of tough guy. Brashear at $1.4M/year and Voros at $1M/year are being payed too much money for what they have managed to contribute this year. The Rangers need an economy tough guy that doesn’t take up as much space in the salary cap. It might not be a bad idea to consider promoting some young player from the minors. Perhaps Hartford Wolf Pack forwards Dane Byers, Devin DiDiomete or Justin Soryal could carry that load...certainly more value for money at $500K or $508K/year.
The Rangers’ struggling skipper Chris Drury, at a salary of $7.05M, has only 8 goals and 19 points in 47 matches. Given the intangibles of grit (wins face-offs, blocks shots) and leadership, that Drury brings to the Rangers, both on the ice and (you would assume) in the dressing room, it’s difficult to assess what should be done about this situation. Even with all that Drury brings to the table for the Rangers, is he worth that big money even without the consistent and prolific scoring you would expect of a player at that salary point? What would be (even if it were possible at his inflated salary and “No Movement” clause) the impact of moving Drury on? At his current salary, he would be a very tough trade for another team to swallow. If the Rangers are winning tons of games, Drury’s salary becomes a non-issue. But this is not the case.
The Rangers are riding the rollercoaster of .500 hockey and their salary cap is stretched a bit beyond the breaking point. Meanwhile promising and talented young hopefuls toil in the NCAA, European leagues, junior hockey, and in the AHL. All of which makes you begin to wonder how long the Rangers can afford to juggle such huge contracts without corresponding return in production, and even more importantly how they can justify continuing to juggle them with so much young, affordable talent to choose from.
So the questions for the Rangers seem to be consistency, scoring, and toughness. The Rangers have to make up their mind as an organization whether or not it’s worth it to continue to have marquee names at the club at an inflated salary. The Rangers have to make up their minds whether or not they are going to commit to a full rebuild of the team. Del Zotto, Girardi, Anisimov, and Lisin being incorporated into the team is a good beginning. If the Rangers are going to compete for championships, it’s going to take more than what they bring to the table now. Much more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
